OOC Name: Elliot
Your In-Game Name / Position: Elliot
Suggestion:
- Make all important chat the same colour.
For example:
[OOC] CT 5454 Example: Example ooc!
[OOC] 501st SGT Example: Example ooc!
[Communications] CG CPL Example: Example chat!
[Communications] GM CPT Example: Example chat!
[Secure Communications] RC CPT Example: Example of very secure communications!
[Secure Communications] Jedi Padawan Example: Example of very secure communications!
[Global RP] 501st SGT Example: Example of roleplay!
[Global RP] 41st SGT Example: Example of roleplay!
How will your suggestion benefit the server:
I believe that adding this change would make the chat look a lot less unorganised and messy, as right now there are multiple colours going on for the same thing which makes it look awfully confusing. This is because the chat colour follows the battalion of the player who is posting it, when it could be set the same colours, but have their name in their battalion colour.
This will also allow easy identification of what battalion is posting what, as it would only change the colour of the name of the individual using the command, but the tag colour such as [Communications] would always stay the same, making it easily identifiable as communications.
Anything else:
Your In-Game Name / Position: Elliot
Suggestion:
- Make all important chat the same colour.
For example:
[OOC] CT 5454 Example: Example ooc!
[OOC] 501st SGT Example: Example ooc!
[Communications] CG CPL Example: Example chat!
[Communications] GM CPT Example: Example chat!
[Secure Communications] RC CPT Example: Example of very secure communications!
[Secure Communications] Jedi Padawan Example: Example of very secure communications!
[Global RP] 501st SGT Example: Example of roleplay!
[Global RP] 41st SGT Example: Example of roleplay!
How will your suggestion benefit the server:
I believe that adding this change would make the chat look a lot less unorganised and messy, as right now there are multiple colours going on for the same thing which makes it look awfully confusing. This is because the chat colour follows the battalion of the player who is posting it, when it could be set the same colours, but have their name in their battalion colour.
This will also allow easy identification of what battalion is posting what, as it would only change the colour of the name of the individual using the command, but the tag colour such as [Communications] would always stay the same, making it easily identifiable as communications.
Anything else:
Last edited:
